How AI answer engines name MIDs
Data through October 21, 2026
Across 1,585 answers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google's AI surfaces gave to buyer questions about Fintech between May 10, 2026 and October 21, 2026, MIDs was named in 10 (0.6%).
Last 28 days: named in 6 of 1,137 answers in its home categories (0.5%), down 0.3 points from the 28 days before.
By engine
Answers each engine gave to buyer questions about Fintech and iGaming & Betting, and how many of them named MIDs.
| Engine | Named | Answers | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 6 | 597 | 1.0% |
| Claude | 0 | 590 | 0.0% |
| Gemini | 6 | 590 | 1.0% |
| Perplexity | 1 | 596 | 0.2% |
| Google AI Mode | 0 | 125 | 0.0% |
| Google AI Overviews | 1 | 43 | 2.3% |
By question type
The same answers, split by the shape of the buyer question.
| Question type | Named | Answers | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best-of | 7 | 366 | 1.9% |
| Ranked list | 0 | 330 | 0.0% |
| Head-to-head | 2 | 323 | 0.6% |
| Is it worth it | 2 | 354 | 0.6% |
| How to choose | 3 | 334 | 0.9% |
| Problem first | 0 | 334 | 0.0% |
| News | 0 | 500 | 0.0% |
Week by week
MIDs was named in at least one answer in 8 of the 18 weeks on record; the latest was the week of October 12, 2026.
Each week's answers to buyer questions about Fintech and iGaming & Betting, Monday to Sunday, newest first, and how many of them named MIDs. The questions asked can differ from one week to the next.
| Week of | Named | Answers | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 73 | 0.0% | |
| 5 | 353 | 1.4% | |
| 1 | 324 | 0.3% | |
| 1 | 315 | 0.3% | |
| 1 | 204 | 0.5% | |
| 2 | 276 | 0.7% | |
| 2 | 220 | 0.9% | |
| 1 | 192 | 0.5% | |
| 1 | 84 | 1.2% | |
| 0 | 48 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 40 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 54 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 52 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 34 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 110 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 111 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 48 | 0.0% | |
| 0 | 3 | 0.0% |
Named first
When an answer named MIDs alongside another brand in this record, it was named first in 2 of 10 (20.0%).
Named alongside
Sources the engines cited when they named MIDs
Domains cited in answers that named MIDs, by the number of those answers that cited them.
| Domain | Answers |
|---|---|
| linkedin.com | 4 |
| multi-flow.pro | 4 |
| aliyuncs.com | 3 |
| seeklogo.com | 3 |
| citehawk.com | 2 |
| igaming-payment-gateway.com | 2 |
| whop.com | 2 |
| acnews.net | 1 |
| adyen.com | 1 |
| airwallex.com | 1 |
MIDs's own site (mids.com) was cited in 2 of 14 (14.3%).
Across every answer run in the Machine Relations Index, not only the answers that named MIDs, mids.com was cited in 13 of 29,566 (0.04%), by 3 of the 6 engines it observes. The Index is still collecting evidence on mids.com before it grades or ranks it.
Across every Fintech buyer question, not only the answers that named MIDs, the Machine Relations Index ranks which sources AI engines cite for Fintech questions.
All categories
| Category | Named | Answers | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech | 10 | 1,585 | 0.6% |
| iGaming & Betting | 4 | 956 | 0.4% |
How this is measured
Names are matched case-sensitively from each brand's own homepage title, in answers stored by the Machine Relations Index. Only derived counts are published here; no answer text is.
A brand appears only once it has been named in at least 10 answers on 7 separate days.
A name match counts a mention. It does not count a recommendation, and it does not measure sentiment.
Categories are the Index's buyer-question categories.
Source: Machine Relations Index.
FAQ
Does ChatGPT recommend MIDs?
ChatGPT named MIDs in 6 of 597 answers (1.0%) to buyer questions about Fintech and iGaming & Betting between May 10, 2026 and October 21, 2026. This record counts a name, not a recommendation: it does not judge whether the answer endorsed MIDs.
Which sources do AI engines cite when they mention MIDs?
The domains cited most often in answers that named MIDs were linkedin.com (4 answers), multi-flow.pro (4 answers) and aliyuncs.com (3 answers).
Which AI engine names MIDs most often?
Google AI Overviews, at 2.3%: it named MIDs in 1 of 43 answers to buyer questions about Fintech and iGaming & Betting.