How AI answer engines name Arbor

By engine

Answers each engine gave to buyer questions about Local Services, and how many of them named Arbor.

By question type

The same answers, split by the shape of the buyer question.

Week by week

Arbor was named in at least one answer in 5 of the 7 weeks on record; the latest was the week of November 2, 2026.

Each week's answers to buyer questions about Local Services, Monday to Sunday, newest first, and how many of them named Arbor. The questions asked can differ from one week to the next.

Named first

When an answer named Arbor alongside another brand in this record, it was named first in 4 of 6 (66.7%).

Named alongside

• Tree Scouts: named together in 3 answers
• Austin Tree Experts: named together in 1 answer
• Brand Visibility: named together in 1 answer
• Claude: named together in 1 answer
• Faindly: named together in 1 answer
• Insight Partners: named together in 1 answer
• Perplexity: named together in 1 answer

Other sources the engines cited when they named Arbor

Domains other than Arbor's own sites, ranked by the number of answers that named Arbor and cited each domain. Own-site citations are shown separately below.

Arbor's own site (arbor.eco) was cited in 1 of 10 (10.0%).

Across every answer run in the Machine Relations Index, not only the answers that named Arbor, arbor.eco was cited in 2 of 37,140 (0.01%), by 2 of the 6 engines it observes. The Index is still collecting evidence on arbor.eco before it grades or ranks it.

Across every Local Services buyer question, not only the answers that named Arbor, the Machine Relations Index ranks which sources AI engines cite for Local Services questions.

All categories

How this is measured

Names are matched case-sensitively from each brand's own homepage title, in answers stored by the Machine Relations Index. Only derived counts are published here; no answer text is.

A brand appears only once it has been named in at least 10 answers on 7 separate days.

A name match counts a mention. It does not count a recommendation, and it does not measure sentiment.

Categories are the Index's buyer-question categories.

Window-to-window brand movement is unmeasured. The stored counts do not establish unchanged prompts, collection instruments and sampling weights across periods. Historical counts and weekly rows are descriptive, not a matched trend.

Source: Machine Relations Index.

FAQ